Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16
From: Manuel Reimer
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 05:33:03 EST
Nathan Scott schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote:
could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16?
There have been some bugs:
These are the same problem. 2.6.16 is unaffected.
But the bug has been filed for 188.8.131.52.
Did you want to say, that the latest 2.6.16 is unaffected?
want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs.
For XFS, its goodness. 2.6.18 will be good too, and 184.108.40.206+.
What exactly did you want to tell with this sentence. Sorry, but my
native language is german...
Is it a good solution to stay on the 2.6.16 branch? Of course I could
use 2.6.17 or 2.6.18 but I want to update the kernel as infrequent as
possible. After 2.6.18 there will be 2.6.19 and 2.6.20. If I continue
that way, then I'll have more downtime than uptime.
Thank you very much in advance
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/