Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16

From: Manuel Reimer
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 05:33:03 EST

Nathan Scott schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote:

could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? There have been some bugs:

These are the same problem. 2.6.16 is unaffected.

But the bug has been filed for

Did you want to say, that the latest 2.6.16 is unaffected?

want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs.

For XFS, its goodness. 2.6.18 will be good too, and

What exactly did you want to tell with this sentence. Sorry, but my native language is german...

Is it a good solution to stay on the 2.6.16 branch? Of course I could use 2.6.17 or 2.6.18 but I want to update the kernel as infrequent as possible. After 2.6.18 there will be 2.6.19 and 2.6.20. If I continue that way, then I'll have more downtime than uptime.

Thank you very much in advance



To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at