Re: Time to forbid non-subscribers from posting to the list?
From: Lee Revell
Date: Tue Aug 08 2006 - 16:23:03 EST
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 21:16 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:39:16PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Ar Maw, 2006-08-08 am 13:23 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> > > You would make bug reports impossible from normal people who
> > > don't want to subscribe fully. It would totally wreck the
> > > development model.
> > Only if applied without imagination.
> > Tag subject lines from non subscribes with [nonsub] and everyone can
> > then decide for themselves.
> This looks like a very clever yet simple idea (if easy to implement at all) !
> While I have no anti-spam and am not annoyed at all by the low spam rate on
> LKML, I think this would make my cleaning operations even more effective.
That would mean 8 fewer characters of useful information visible in the
The spam ratio on LKML is so low that I think this cure would be worse
than the disease. Why can't the minority of LKML readers who have
absolutely zero tolerance for spam just filter locally?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/