Add the UdpSndbufErrors and UdpRcvbufErrors MIBs

From: Martin Bligh
Date: Wed Aug 09 2006 - 18:29:25 EST


Add the UdpSndbufErrors and UdpRcvbufErrors MIBs

Signed-off-by: Martin Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx>


Add the UdpSndbufErrors and UdpRcvbufErrors MIBs

Signed-off-by: Martin Bligh <mbligh@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff -aurpN -X /home/mbligh/.diff.exclude linux-2.6.18-rc3/include/linux/snmp.h linux-2.6.18-rc3-udp_mibs/include/linux/snmp.h
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/include/linux/snmp.h 2005-10-27 17:02:08.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-udp_mibs/include/linux/snmp.h 2006-08-09 15:23:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum
UDP_MIB_NOPORTS, /* NoPorts */
UDP_MIB_INERRORS, /* InErrors */
UDP_MIB_OUTDATAGRAMS, /* OutDatagrams */
+ UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS, /* RcvbufErrors */
+ UDP_MIB_SNDBUFERRORS, /* SndbufErrors */
__UDP_MIB_MAX
};

diff -aurpN -X /home/mbligh/.diff.exclude linux-2.6.18-rc3/net/ipv4/proc.c linux-2.6.18-rc3-udp_mibs/net/ipv4/proc.c
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/net/ipv4/proc.c 2006-06-20 14:07:21.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-udp_mibs/net/ipv4/proc.c 2006-08-09 15:23:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ static const struct snmp_mib snmp4_udp_l
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("NoPorts", UDP_MIB_NOPORTS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("InErrors", UDP_MIB_INERRORS),
SNMP_MIB_ITEM("OutDatagrams", UDP_MIB_OUTDATAGRAMS),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RcvbufErrors", UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS),
+ SNMP_MIB_ITEM("SndbufErrors", UDP_MIB_SNDBUFERRORS),
SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
};

diff -aurpN -X /home/mbligh/.diff.exclude linux-2.6.18-rc3/net/ipv4/udp.c linux-2.6.18-rc3-udp_mibs/net/ipv4/udp.c
--- linux-2.6.18-rc3/net/ipv4/udp.c 2006-07-31 10:19:01.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc3-udp_mibs/net/ipv4/udp.c 2006-08-09 15:23:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -661,6 +661,16 @@ out:
UDP_INC_STATS_USER(UDP_MIB_OUTDATAGRAMS);
return len;
}
+ /*
+ * ENOBUFS = no kernel mem, SOCK_NOSPACE = no sndbuf space. Reporting
+ * ENOBUFS might not be good (it's not tunable per se), but otherwise
+ * we don't have a good statistic (IpOutDiscards but it can be too many
+ * things). We could add another new stat but at least for now that
+ * seems like overkill.
+ */
+ if (err == -ENOBUFS || test_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags)) {
+ UDP_INC_STATS_USER(UDP_MIB_SNDBUFERRORS);
+ }
return err;

do_confirm:
@@ -980,6 +990,7 @@ static int udp_encap_rcv(struct sock * s
static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock * sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct udp_sock *up = udp_sk(sk);
+ int rc;

/*
* Charge it to the socket, dropping if the queue is full.
@@ -1026,7 +1037,10 @@ static int udp_queue_rcv_skb(struct sock
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
}

- if (sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk,skb)<0) {
+ if ((rc = sock_queue_rcv_skb(sk,skb)) < 0) {
+ /* Note that an ENOMEM error is charged twice */
+ if (rc == -ENOMEM)
+ UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_RCVBUFERRORS);
UDP_INC_STATS_BH(UDP_MIB_INERRORS);
kfree_skb(skb);
return -1;