Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack
From: Matt Mackall
Date: Wed Aug 09 2006 - 22:08:26 EST
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> name, rather than "um" to checkstack.pl.
Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?
Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining
Voyager users proper computers?
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/