Re: [PATCH] UML - support checkstack

From: Matt Mackall
Date: Wed Aug 09 2006 - 22:08:26 EST

On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 02:15:24PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
> Make checkstack work for UML. We need to pass the underlying architecture
> name, rather than "um" to

Does this do the right thing with something like Voyager?

Or should we just get together a small fund to send the remaining
Voyager users proper computers?

Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at