Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Aug 10 2006 - 02:28:16 EST
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 16:58 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 16:07:20 +0200
> > Hmm, what does sk_buff::input_dev do? That seems to store the initial
> > device?
> You can run grep on the tree just as easily as I can which is what I
> did to answer this question. It only takes a few seconds of your
> time to grep the source tree for things like "skb->input_dev", so
> would you please do that before asking more questions like this?
That is exactly what I did, but I wanted a bit of confirmation. Sorry if
offends you, but I'm a bit new to this network thing.
> It does store the initial device, but as Thomas tried so hard to
> explain to you guys these device pointers in the skb are transient and
> you cannot refer to them outside of packet receive processing.
Yes, I understood that after Thomas' last mail.
> The reason is that there is no refcounting performed on these devices
> when they are attached to the skb, for performance reasons, and thus
> the device can be downed, the module for it removed, etc. long before
> the skb is freed up.
I understood that, thanks.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/