Re: softirq considered harmful
From: David Miller
Date: Thu Aug 10 2006 - 07:39:21 EST
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:06:27 +0200
> run_timer_softirq+0x0/0x18e: took 3750
> run_timer_softirq+0x0/0x18e: took 2595
> run_timer_softirq+0x0/0x18e: took 6265
> run_timer_softirq+0x0/0x18e: took 2608
> So from 2.6 to 6.2msecs just that handler, auch. During normal running,
> the 2.6 msec variant triggers quite often.
It would be interesting to know what timers ran when
the overhead got this high.
You can probably track this with a per-cpu array
of pointers, have run_timer_softirq record the
t->func pointers into the array as it runs the
current slew of timers, then if the "took" is
very large dump the array.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/