Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
From: Roman Zippel
Date: Thu Aug 10 2006 - 09:50:21 EST
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Roman Zippel wrote:
> > If you force everyone to use 64bit sector numbers, I don't understand how
> > you can claim "still working just fine on 32bit"?
> 64bit sector numbers work just fine on 32-bit machines.
Depends on the definition of "fine".
> > At some point ext4 is probably going to be the de facto standard, which very
> > many people want to use, because it has all the new features, which won't be
> > ported to ext2/3. So I still don't understand, what's so wrong about a
> > little tuning in both directions?
> Just seems like wasted effort to me.
Many developer still brag about how Linux runs on about everything, but
it's little steps like this, which make it more and more a joke.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/