On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Roman Zippel wrote:If you force everyone to use 64bit sector numbers, I don't understand how64bit sector numbers work just fine on 32-bit machines.
you can claim "still working just fine on 32bit"?
Depends on the definition of "fine".
At some point ext4 is probably going to be the de facto standard, which veryJust seems like wasted effort to me.
many people want to use, because it has all the new features, which won't be
ported to ext2/3. So I still don't understand, what's so wrong about a
little tuning in both directions?
Many developer still brag about how Linux runs on about everything, but it's little steps like this, which make it more and more a joke.