Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Thu Aug 10 2006 - 22:35:00 EST
Thomas Graf wrote:
skb->dev is not guaranteed to still point to the "allocating" device
once the skb is freed again so reserve/unreserve isn't symmetric.
You'd need skb->alloc_dev or something.
There's another consequence of this property of the network
Every network interface must be able to fall back to these
MEMALLOC allocations, because the memory critical socket
could be on another network interface. Hence, we cannot
know which network interfaces should (not) be marked MEMALLOC.
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/