Re: [Fastboot] [CFT] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Sat Aug 12 2006 - 03:21:39 EST
Don Zickus <dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >> I'm a little disappointed but at this point it isn't a great surprise,
>> >> the code is early yet and hasn't had much testing or attention.
>> >> I wonder if I have missed something else silly.
>> >> As for testing, can you use plain kexec to load the kernel at a
>> >> different address? I'm curious to know if it is something related
>> >> to the kexec on panic path or if it is just running at a different
>> >> location that is the problem.
> I think I have found the 'something silly'. Here is a patch that allows
> our Dell em64t boxes to boot. This change matches the original code. The
> main difference that caused the problems was the setting of _PAGE_NX bit.
> This caused issues in early_io_remap().
> Thanks to Larry Woodman for debugging this.
This looks like a different one but looks fairly sane.
Do you know what code had problems having _PAGE_NX set.
What are we doing with early_ioremap the requires execute
permissions. It doesn't sound right that we would need
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/