Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Aug 14 2006 - 01:02:43 EST
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 21:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:40:53 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Testcase:
> > Mount an NBD device as sole swap device and mmap > physical RAM, then
> > loop through touching pages only once.
> Fix: don't try to swap over the network. Yes, there may be some scenarios
> where people have no local storage, but it's reasonable to expect anyone
> who is using Linux as an "enterprise storage platform" to stick a local
> disk on the thing for swap.
I wish you were right, however there seems to be a large demand to go
diskless and swap over iSCSI because disks seem to be the nr. 1 failing
piece of hardware in systems these days.
> That leaves MAP_SHARED, but mm-tracking-shared-dirty-pages.patch will fix
> that, will it not?
Will makes it less likely. One can still have memory pressure, the
remaining bits of memory can still get stuck in socket queues for
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/