Re: [PATCH] cleanup and remove some extra spinlocks from rtmutex
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Tue Aug 15 2006 - 06:00:00 EST
On 08/15, Esben Nielsen wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Aug 2006, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >task->pi_blocked_on != NULL, we hold task->pi_blocked_on->lock->wait_lock.
> >Can it go away ?
> That is correct. But does it make the code more readable?
Well, in my opinion - yes. But yes, it's only my personal feeling :)
> When you read
> the code you shouldn't need to go into that kind of complicated arguments
> to see the correctness - unless the code can't be written otherwise.
Sure, this needs a comment.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/