Re: [PATCH] Drop second arg of unregister_chrdev()

From: Jonathan Corbet
Date: Tue Aug 15 2006 - 15:49:58 EST


> * "name" is trivially unused.
> * Requirement to pass to unregister function anything but cookie you've
> got from register counterpart is wrong.

Might this, instead, be an opportunity to get rid of the internal
register_chrdev() and unregister_chrdev() calls in favor of the cdev
interface? register_chrdev() is a bit of a backward-compatibility hack
at this point, and cdevs, in theory, are safer since they won't present
drivers with minor numbers they might not be prepared to handle.

jon

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/