Re: [PATCH] Drop second arg of unregister_chrdev()
From: Jonathan Corbet
Date: Tue Aug 15 2006 - 15:49:58 EST
> * "name" is trivially unused.
> * Requirement to pass to unregister function anything but cookie you've
> got from register counterpart is wrong.
Might this, instead, be an opportunity to get rid of the internal
register_chrdev() and unregister_chrdev() calls in favor of the cdev
interface? register_chrdev() is a bit of a backward-compatibility hack
at this point, and cdevs, in theory, are safer since they won't present
drivers with minor numbers they might not be prepared to handle.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/