Re: The Proposed Linux kevent API

From: Howard Chu
Date: Tue Aug 22 2006 - 22:00:13 EST


Nicholas Miell wrote:
Having looked all this over to figure out what it actually does, I can
make the following comments:

- there's a distinct lack of any sort of commenting beyond brief
descriptions of what the occasional function is supposed to do

- the kevent interface is all the horror of the BSD kqueue interface,
but with no compatibility with the BSD kqueue interface.

- lots of parameters from userspace go unsanitized, although I'm not
sure if this will actually cause problems. At the very least, there
should be checks for unknown flags and use of reserved fields, lest
somebody start using them for their own purposes and then their app
breaks when a newer version of the kernel starts using them itself.


Which reminds me, why go through the trouble of copying the structs back and forth between userspace and kernel space? Why not map the struct array and leave it in place, as I proposed back here?
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_frm/ thread/57847cfedb61bdd5/8d02afa60a8f83af?lnk=gst&q=equeue&rnum= 1#8d02afa60a8f83af

--
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc
OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/