Re: Why Semaphore Hardware-Dependent?

From: Paul Mackerras
Date: Mon Aug 28 2006 - 20:57:42 EST


Andi Kleen writes:

> > That's fair enough, but I would be opposed to
> > making semaphores bigger
>
> If the code was out of lined bigger wouldn't make much difference

I was referring to the data size not the code size.

> That would leave the fast path, but does it help that much there
> to have a more complicated implementation?

The implementation of the fast path is basically atomic_inc/dec.
Nothing more complicated.

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/