Re: [PATCH] MODULE_FIRMWARE for binary firmware(s)

[David Lang]

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Sven Luther wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:52:02AM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > > you are assuming that
> > > >
> > > > 1. modules are enabled and ipw2200 is compiled as a module
> > >
> > > No, why?
> >
> > becouse if the ipw isn't compiled as a module then it's initialized
> > (without firmware) before the initramfs or initrd is run. if it could be
> > initialized later without being a module then it could be initialized as
> > part of the normal system
>
> Euh, ...
>
> I wonder why you need to initialize the ipw2200 module so early ? It was my
> understanding that the initramfs thingy was run very early in the process, and
> i had even thought of moving fbdev modules into it.
>
> Do you really need to bring up ipw2200 so early ? It is some kind of wireless
> device, right ?

if modules are not in use the device is initialized when the kernel starts up. 
this is before any userspace starts.

> As for initramfs, you can just cat it behind the kernel, and it should work
> just fine, or at least this is how it was supposed to work.

yes, if I want to set one up.

other then this new requirement to have the ipw2200 driver as a module I have no 
reason to use one. normal userspace is good enough for me.

David Lang

> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/