On 9/1/06, Olaf Kirch <okir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 11:31:25AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
I don't like this. The idea that multiple RPC services are listeningWhy do you consider this a hack? I have always felt that librpc requiring
on the same port is a total hack. What other service might use this
besides NFSACL?
you to open separate ports for every program you register was a poor
design. The RPC header contains the program number, and the RPC code
is fully capable of demuxing incoming requests. So I do not think it is
a hack at all.
And yes, Solaris NFSACL resides on 2049 too.
I meant "Does Solaris advertise NFSACL on 2049 via the portmapper?"