Re: [PATCH 00/26] Dynamic kernel command-line

From: Luca
Date: Mon Sep 04 2006 - 13:05:17 EST


(trimming CC list)

Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
Alon Bar-Lev writes:
>
>> Current implementation stores a static command-line
>> buffer allocated to COMMAND_LINE_SIZE size. Most
>> architectures stores two copies of this buffer, one
>> for future reference and one for parameter parsing.
>
> Under what circumstances do we actually need a command line of more
> than 256 bytes?
>
> It seems to me that if 256 bytes isn't enough, we should take a deep
> breath, step back, and think about whether there might be a better way
> to pass whatever information it is that's using up so much of the
> command line.

Well, if you want to set a parameter of a builtin module you have to
use:
modulename.parameter=whatever

which can use a lot of space... I suppose that with an "everything
builtin" kernel and a few modules to tune you can get near the limit.

Luca
--
Home: http://kronoz.cjb.net
Il tempo speso
a coltivare sogni
non è sprecato.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/