Re: patch to make Linux capabilities into something useful (v 0.3.1)

[Bernd Eckenfels]

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 01:00:28AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> If attacker already has priviledge foo, he can just go use it. He does
> not have to exec() poor program not expecting to get priviledge foo,
> then abusing it.

It is not about attackers. It is about normal usage. If you spawn a program,
it might behave wrong since it does not know that it is priveledged. For
example a network daemon might start a child process which interacts with
the user, and forgets to drop priveldges for it.

> Sanitized here means "all regular capabilities set, all others
> cleared".

Yes, however I thought this was exactly what the patch is not doing?

Gruss
Bernd
-- 
  (OO)     -- Bernd_Eckenfels@Mörscher_Strasse_8.76185Karlsruhe.de --
 ( .. )    ecki@{inka.de,linux.de,debian.org}  http://www.eckes.org/
  o--o   1024D/E383CD7E  eckes@IRCNet  v:+497211603874  f:+49721151516129
(O____O)  When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/