Re: [PATCH 0/7] Integrity Service and SLIM

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 10:57:25 -0700
Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is an updated request for comments on a proposed integrity 
> service framework and dummy provider, along with SLIM, a low 
> water-mark mandatory access control LSM module which utilizes the 
> integrity services as additional input to the access control decisions.

Having carefully reviewed your code I have come to the firm conclusion that
it is written in C.  The next step is to put it all in -mm and see if
anyone shouts at me.

I'll need help on the upstream-merge decision.

A convincing statement of interest (or, better, intent) from vendors (ie:
the people who will deliver and support this into the target users) would
help a lot.  Where do we stand with that?

Thanks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/