Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Karim Yaghmour]

Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Thank you for this, it just proves that taking this discussion any
> further is a waste of everybody's time.

Sorry you feel this way.

> Nobody ever said you were irresponsible, but you are claiming that you
> are able to define a finite set of static tracepoints that are relevant
> to everybody. Or in other words, they are defined as being the ones
> relevant to you.

No, I'm precisely not claiming that the tracepoints I was looking for
were "relevant to everybody". They are, however, very relevant to any
standard sysadmin or developer who wants to get a better picture of
what his kernel is doing. Again, please refer to figure 2 of this
article and explain to me why it's not relevant for standard users
and developers to understand when these events happen inside the
kernel:
http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix2000/general/full_papers/yaghmour/yaghmour_html/index.html

Karim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/