Re: tracepoint maintainance models

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > This thread would be much better off talking about how to go about 
> > implementing lightweight markers rather than spent on mindless rants.
> 
> i agree, as long as it's lightweight markers for _dynamic tracers_, so 
> that we keep our options open - as per the arguments above.

Could you please explain, why we can't have markers which are usable by 
any tracer?

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/