Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > > [...] I think Ingo said that some "static tracepoints" (eg. 
> > > annotation) could be acceptable.
> > 
> > No, he made it rather clear, that as far as possible he only wants 
> > dynamic annotations (e.g. via function attributes).
> 
> what you say is totally and utterly nonsensical misrepresentation of 
> what i have said. I always said: i support in-source annotations too (I 
> even suggested APIs how to do them),

Some consistency would certainly help:
'my suggested API is not "barely usable" for static tracers but "totally 
unusable".'

<20060916082214.GD6317@xxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/