Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.5 for Linux 2.6.17 (with probe management)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +config MARK_SYMBOL
> +config MARK_JUMP_CALL
> +config MARK_JUMP_INLINE
> +config MARK_JUMP

same NACK over the proliferation of options as before:

  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=115881457219562&w=2

Tap, tap, is this thing on? ;)

found one related reply from you that i didnt answer yet:

  "As an example, LTTng traces the page fault handler, when kprobes just
   can't instrument it."

but tracing a raw pagefault at the arch level is a bad idea anyway, we 
want to trace __handle_mm_fault(). That way you can avoid having to 
modify every architecture's pagefault handler ...

but the other points remained unanswered as far as i can see.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/