Re: wpa supplicant/ipw3945, ESSID last char missing

[Jeff Garzik]

John W. Linville wrote:
> The more we can clean-up the WE API, the easier it will be to implement
> the cfg80211 WE compatibility layer intended for wireless-dev.
> I think WE-21 makes things better in that respect.
>
> Finally, I already scaled-back Jean's original WE-21 patch.  I only
> anticipate minor bug fixes for WE from now on, with nl80211/cfg80211
> as the heir-apparent.
>
> With all that said, I'd prefer to keep the existing WE-21 patches and
> add Jean's fixes ASAP.  Is this acceptable?  If not, I'll submit the
> reversions to Jeff ASAP.

I for one don't want to change the userspace ABI for this...  If I had 
realized the userspace ABI was changing (<- my fault), I wouldn't have 
merged the changes in the first place.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/