Re: [discuss] Re: Please pull x86-64 bug fixes

[Jeff Garzik]

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:43, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Thursday 05 October 2006 19:17, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does this fix the following issue:
> > > >
> > > > PCI: BIOS Bug: MCFG area at e0000000 is not E820-reserved
> > > > PCI: Not using MMCONFIG.
> > > >
> > > > 100% of my x86-64 boxes, AMD or Intel, print this message.  And 100% of 
> > > > them work just fine with MMCONFIG.
> > > No. 
> > >
> > > But it isn't really a issue. Basically everything[1] will work fine anyways.
> > >
> > > [1]  Only thing you're missing AFAIK is PCI Extended Error Reporting.
> > Not really true, I have some cards which have >256 bytes of config space.
>
> Yes for advanced error handling (which we only support in a few drivers
> right now) I'm not aware of any card that uses it for anything else. Do you 
> have evidence of that?

I need it to access chip-specific configuration registers on a PCI 
Express card.  It's under NDA so that's all I can say.

This will become more common as PCI Express becomes more common, as 
well.  It's largely only luck that we haven't run into more cases like 
this.  Most PCI-Ex devices, like most PCI devices, just don't need a 
whole lot of PCI configuration space.


> > > > I think this rule is far too drastic for real life.
> > > If you have a better proposal please share. I tried a few others, but none
> > > of them could handle all the buggy Intel 9x5 boards that hang on any
> > > mmconfig access (so the "try the first few busses" check already hangs)
> > >
> > > Originally I thought
> > > DMI blacklisting would work, but it's on too many systems for that
> > > (and Linus rightfully hated it anyways). ACPI checks also didn't work.
> > > I don't know of any others.
> > It's a bit disappointing, since I keep getting brand new boxes with 
> > brand new BIOSen, but keep hitting this rule.
>
> A lot of new boxes are actually buggy due to a common Intel reference
> BIOS bug. There are also a couple of other quirks there.
>
> I suppose it'll only become better once Windows starts using MCFG.
>  
> > My proposal is quite simple:  "something that works" -- the current 
> > solution obviously does not.
>
> If you have a patch that works with all known BIOS bugs (including Mac Mini,
> a random Intel 975 board and a Asus AMD K8 board with PCI Express) please share it.

Can you then please share the list of known BIOS bugs?

All I have to do on my machines is work around the disable-mmconfig 
code, and things start working.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/