Re: [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Centrino PM Core and OPs registration2/3

From: Eugeny S. Mints
Date: Mon Oct 09 2006 - 09:42:53 EST


Dominik Brodowski wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:50:02PM +0400, Eugeny S. Mints wrote:

+static int +process_pwr_param(struct pm_core_point *opt, int op, char *param_name,
+ int va_arg)
+{
+ int cpu = 0;
+ char buf[8];
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++)
+ {
+ sprintf(buf, "v%d", cpu);
+
+ if (strcmp(param_name, buf) == 0) {
+ if (op == PWR_PARAM_SET)
+ opt->opt[cpu].pwpr[_I386_PM_CORE_POINT_V] = + va_arg;
+ else if (opt != NULL)
+ *(int *)va_arg = + opt->opt[cpu].pwpr[_I386_PM_CORE_POINT_V];
+ else if ((*(int *)va_arg = get_vtg(cpu)) <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ sprintf(buf, "freq%d", cpu);
+
+ if (strcmp(param_name, buf) == 0) {
+ if (op == PWR_PARAM_SET)
+ opt->opt[cpu].pwpr[_I386_PM_CORE_POINT_FREQ] = + va_arg;
+ else if (opt != NULL)
+ *(int *)va_arg = + opt->opt[cpu].pwpr[_I386_PM_CORE_POINT_FREQ];
+ else if ((*(int *)va_arg = get_freq(cpu)) <= 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+}

Ouch. IIRC Pavel had some fine comments about such string parsing deep in
arch code... Other than that I see lots of indirection, lots of code being
added (~400 lines) for no gain in functionality for the x86 case.
THis code is no longer anyhow relevant to the latest take of PowerOP. Please check to make sure that you are looking at the very latest PowerOP code submitted for discussion. Latest PowerOP take gets rid of all parsing. Latest patches do not contain x86 patch yet but omap PM core reference code is supplied. So please use omap code for the discussion. FYI, forward porting of x86 patches to the latest POwerOP is on the way.

Thanks,
Eugeny

Thanks,
Dominik


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/