Re: [linux-pm] Bug in PCI core

[Matthew Wilcox]

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 01:57:48PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Would it be okay for pci_block_user_cfg_access() to use its own cache, so 
> it doesn't interfere with data previously cached by pci_save_state()?

My suggestion is just to require that the callers have previously called
pci_save_state().  The PCI PM stack already has, and it's a one-line
change to the IPR driver.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/