Re: [PATCH] Undeprecate the sysctl system call

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wed Oct 18 2006 - 07:34:28 EST


Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> Its very simple: sysctl was a neat BSD syscall that turned out to be
> less ideal than using the fs for it. We added it, we supported it, we
> get to keep it. We just stick notes in the docs saying "please use /proc
> instead".

You call that numerical name space neat? IMHO it was a totally bogus
idea. There is already a perfectly fine file system name space, why
add another one?

Anyways, imho the right solution is to remove the numerical
sysctl infrastructure (including most of sysctl.h), but keep
sys_sysctl() with a small mapping table that maps the few
numerical sysctls (mostly KERN_VERSION) that are actually used to
path names internally. The rest should be ENOSYS.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/