Re: [RFC] cpuset: add interface to isolated cpus

[Paul Jackson]

Dinakar wrote:
> IMO this patch addresses just one of the requirements for partitionable
> sched domains

Correct - this particular patch was just addressing one of these.

Nick raised the reasonable concern that this patch was adding something
to cpusets that was not especially related to cpusets.

So I will not be sending this patch to Andrew for *-mm.

There are further opportunities for improvements in some of this code,
which my colleague Christoph Lameter may be taking an interest in.
Ideally kernel-user API's for isolating and partitioning sched domains
would arise from that work, though I don't know if we can wait that
long.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/