Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()

From: Jarek Poplawski
Date: Mon Oct 30 2006 - 08:22:00 EST


On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 02:12:41PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Here are some doubts...
...
> On 30-10-2006 10:03, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: spin_lock_irqsave_nested()
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested);
> >
> > #endif
> >
> >
>
> Shouldn't this _nested locks be considered in:
> #else /* CONFIG_PREEMPT: */
> part?

Sorry, this one is not my doubt anymore.

Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/