Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised again

[Jörn Engel]

On Wed, 1 November 2006 13:02:12 -0500, Holden Karau wrote:
> On 11/1/06, Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >Result would be something like:
> >        c_bh = kmalloc(...
> >        err = -ENOMEM;
> >        if (!c_bh)
> >                goto error;
> That wouldn't work so well since we always return err,

I don't quite follow.  If the branch is taken, err is -ENOMEM.  If the
branch is not taken, err is set to 0 with the next instruction.

Both methods definitely work.  Whether one is preferrable over the
other is imo 90% taste and maybe 10% better code on some architecture.
So just pick what you prefer.

Jörn

-- 
Unless something dramatically changes, by 2015 we'll be largely
wondering what all the fuss surrounding Linux was really about.
-- Rob Enderle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/