Re: [PATCH 4/7] paravirtualization: Allow selected bug checks tobe skipped by paravirt kernels

From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wed Nov 01 2006 - 19:02:18 EST


On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:29 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:30:43 +1100
> Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-i386/bugs.h
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> > #include <asm/processor.h>
> > #include <asm/i387.h>
> > #include <asm/msr.h>
> > +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>
> In many other places you have
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> ...
>
> But not here.
>
> Making <asm/paravirt.h> invulnerable would be the more typical approach.

It *is* actually safe. The "#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT / #include
<asm/paravirt.h> / #else / <... native versions...>" is to give a big
hint to the reader to look in paravirt.h for the real definitions.

Originally I had a noparavirt.h where all these lived, and people hated
it. So we did it this way, which minimizes churn.

Rusty.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/