Re: [PATCH] IRQ: ease out-of-tree migration to new irq_handler prototype

[William D Waddington]

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 10:29:37AM -0800, William D Waddington wrote:
>
> > Ease out-of-tree driver migration to new irq_handler prototype.
> > Define empty 3rd argument macro for use in multi kernel version
> > out-of-tree drivers going forward.  Backportable drives can do:
> >
> > (in a header)
> > #ifndef __PT_REGS
> > # define __PT_REGS , struct pt_regs *regs
> > #endif
>
>
> Backportable drivers should check kernel version themselves and define
> __PT_REGS themselves.

I think I provided too much information :(  It would be sufficiently
helpful to just #define __PT_REGS <nothing> in  interrupt.h to make
things easier for low-life out-of-tree maintainers.  There isn't any
need to actualy detect version.  Just detect __PT_REGS already defined.

The "in a header" above referred to the driver's header - #ifdefs in
executable code really looks nasty IMHO.

The "#define __PT_REGS , ..." comment below was intended to be a
"helpful" note to driver writers.  Like I said, TMI.

> > (in code body)
> > static irqreturn_t irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id __PT_REGS)
>
>
> > +/*
> > + * Irq handler migration helper - empty 3rd argument
> > + * #define __PT_REGS , struct pt_regs *regs
> > + * for older kernel versions
> > + */
> > +
> > +#define __PT_REGS

How should I tidy this up - if it is acceptable at all?  I'm a
total noob struggling with a 1-line patch.

Bill
--
--------------------------------------------
William D Waddington
Bainbridge Island, WA, USA
william.waddington@xxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------
"Even bugs...are unexpected signposts on
the long road of creativity..." - Ken Burtch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/