Re: lib/iomap.c mmio_{in,out}s* vs. __raw_* accessors

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 16:08 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > Can you work based on something like this instead?
> > 
> > (Totally untested, I just did this as an example of what I think is a lot 
> > more maintainable)
> 
> Yup, that would definitely work for me.
> 
> I'll do the same for the repeat ops..

I'm blind, didn't see you did it for them already :-)

Ok, your patch builds fine here. I can't test at the moment as I don't
have a machine at hand that has a device whose driver uses the ops in
iomap though, but I can't see any reason why it wouldn't work if it
builds, so as far as I'm concerned, that's good to go in 2.6.20.
(earlier if you wish but I won't submit the patch doing the powerpc
changes that makes me use those change before 2.6.20 obviously :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/