Re: [PATCH] debug workqueue locking sanity

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +		if (unlikely(in_atomic()
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
> +			|| current->lockdep_depth > 0
> +#endif
> +			)) {

i agree with this patch, but shouldnt this #ifdef be hidden via some 
sort of lockdep_depth() inline in lockdep.h that just returns 0 if 
!LOCKDEP?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/