Re: VIA IRQ quirk missing PCI ids since 2.6.16.17

[Jeff Garzik]

Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:13:45PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>  > +static const struct pci_device_id via_vlink_fixup_tbl[] = {
>  > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233_0), 17},
>  > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233A), 17 },
>  > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8233C_0), 17 },
>  > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8235), 16 },
>  > +	/* May not be needed for the 8237 */
>  > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237), 15 },
>  > +	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, PCI_DEVICE_ID_VIA_8237A), 15 },
>  >  	{ 0, },
>
> This got me wondering what PCI_VDEVICE was, so I went looking.
> It's a libata'ism it seems with the comment..
>
> /* move to PCI layer? */
>
> Which sounds like a good idea to me.  But until this is moved,
> does quirks.c actually compile with this patch? I don't see
> an include of linux/libata.h there.
>
> When it gets moved to the PCI layer, I wonder if it'd be worth
> doing the same thing to the second argument, so that we'd be
> able to do..
>
> 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, VIA_8233_0), 17},
>
> Or maybe even..
>
> 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(VIA, 8233_0), 17},

Won't work, libata passes hex constants as the second argument...  which 
is the policy I'm encouraging for all places where the PCI_DEVICE_ID_xxx 
is only used in a single place.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/