Re: [patch] cpufreq: mark cpufreq_tsc() as core_initcall_sync

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 13:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >  
> > -core_initcall(cpufreq_tsc);
> > +/*
> > + * init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list() should execute first,
> > + * which is a core_initcall, so mark this one core_initcall_sync:
> > + */
> > +core_initcall_sync(cpufreq_tsc);
> 
> Would prefer that we not use the _sync levels.  They're there as a
> synchronisation for MULTITHREAD_PROBE and might disappear at any time.

Works also fine with postcore_init, but I'm more concerned about the
delayed notification (after the actual change) which is introduced by
this srcu change.

	tglx


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/