Re: 2.6.19-rc5: lockdep warnings starting irattach

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Nov 20 2006 - 04:13:43 EST



* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The comment at the nesting lock says:
>
> /* Careful for priority inversions here !
> * irlmp->links is never taken while another IrDA
> * spinlock is held, so we are safe. Jean II */
>
> So, under the assumption the author was right, it just needs a lockdep
> annotation.
>
> (depends on patches in -mm for spin_lock_irqsave_nested())
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/