Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an archdoesn't support it

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> To be honest, it'd be much easier if we only defined these operations on
> atomic_t's.  We have all the infrastructure in place for them, and
> they're fairly well understood.  If you need different sizes, I'm OK
> with an atomic_pointer_t, or whatever.

FWIW Seconded.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/