Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an archdoesn't support it

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Russell King wrote:

> > Not having cmpxchg is even worse because it requires the introduction and 
> > maintenance of large sets of arch specific operations. Much more complex.
> 
> And which bit of "not available on many architectures" have you not grasped
> yet?

We discussed various forms of emulating that functionality on this thread. 
Seems to work satisfactorily. You can discover the information you skipped 
by going back to some earlier messages of this thread.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/