Re: UML and fastcall/FASTCALL

[Adrian Bunk]

On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop.
> 
> If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either.  The only reason
> there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386.

It's a noop on i386 due to -mregparm=3 ...

> 				Jeff

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/