Re: [NFS] [PATCH 002 of 13] knfsd: SUNRPC: allow creating an RPC service without registering with portmapper

From: Chuck Lever
Date: Fri Dec 08 2006 - 13:07:56 EST

Next message: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz: "Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH 002 of 13] knfsd: SUNRPC: allow creating an RPCservice without registering with portmapper"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Oops. This one looks old. Let me see if I can dig up the latest.

On 12/8/06, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 23:01 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sometimes we need to create an RPC service but not register it with the
> local portmapper. NFSv4 delegation callback, for example.
>
> Change the svc_makesock() API to allow optionally creating temporary or
> permanent sockets, optionally registering with the local portmapper, and
> make it return the ephemeral port of the new socket.

NAK. This one is still buggy.

The NFSv4 callback server should _NOT_ be registering its listening
socket on the RPC server 'temporary' list.

Trond

> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Aurelien Charbon <aurelien.charbon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
>
> ### Diffstat output
> ./fs/lockd/svc.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++----------
> ./fs/nfs/callback.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
> ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 6 ++++--
> ./include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h | 2 +-
> ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 6 ++++--
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff .prev/fs/lockd/svc.c ./fs/lockd/svc.c
> --- .prev/fs/lockd/svc.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./fs/lockd/svc.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> @@ -223,23 +223,29 @@ static int find_socket(struct svc_serv *
> return found;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Make any sockets that are needed but not present.
> + * If nlm_udpport or nlm_tcpport were set as module
> + * options, make those sockets unconditionally
> + */
> static int make_socks(struct svc_serv *serv, int proto)
> {
> - /* Make any sockets that are needed but not present.
> - * If nlm_udpport or nlm_tcpport were set as module
> - * options, make those sockets unconditionally
> - */
> - static int warned;
> + static int warned;
> int err = 0;
> +
> if (proto == IPPROTO_UDP || nlm_udpport)
> if (!find_socket(serv, IPPROTO_UDP))
> - err = svc_makesock(serv, IPPROTO_UDP, nlm_udpport);
> - if (err == 0 && (proto == IPPROTO_TCP || nlm_tcpport))
> + err = svc_makesock(serv, IPPROTO_UDP, nlm_udpport,
> + SVC_SOCK_DEFAULTS);
> + if (err >= 0 && (proto == IPPROTO_TCP || nlm_tcpport))
> if (!find_socket(serv, IPPROTO_TCP))
> - err= svc_makesock(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, nlm_tcpport);
> - if (!err)
> + err = svc_makesock(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, nlm_tcpport,
> + SVC_SOCK_DEFAULTS);
> +
> + if (err >= 0) {
> warned = 0;
> - else if (warned++ == 0)
> + err = 0;
> + } else if (warned++ == 0)
> printk(KERN_WARNING
> "lockd_up: makesock failed, error=%d\n", err);
> return err;
>
> diff .prev/fs/nfs/callback.c ./fs/nfs/callback.c
> --- .prev/fs/nfs/callback.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./fs/nfs/callback.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ static void nfs_callback_svc(struct svc_
> int nfs_callback_up(void)
> {
> struct svc_serv *serv;
> - struct svc_sock *svsk;
> int ret = 0;
>
> lock_kernel();
> @@ -119,17 +118,14 @@ int nfs_callback_up(void)
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> if (!serv)
> goto out_err;
> - /* FIXME: We don't want to register this socket with the portmapper */
> - ret = svc_makesock(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, nfs_callback_set_tcpport);
> - if (ret < 0)
> +
> + ret = svc_makesock(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, nfs_callback_set_tcpport,
> + (SVC_SOCK_ANONYMOUS | SVC_SOCK_TEMPORARY));
> + if (ret <= 0)
> goto out_destroy;
> - if (!list_empty(&serv->sv_permsocks)) {
> - svsk = list_entry(serv->sv_permsocks.next,
> - struct svc_sock, sk_list);
> - nfs_callback_tcpport = ntohs(inet_sk(svsk->sk_sk)->sport);
> - dprintk ("Callback port = 0x%x\n", nfs_callback_tcpport);
> - } else
> - BUG();
> + nfs_callback_tcpport = ret;
> + dprintk("Callback port = 0x%x\n", nfs_callback_tcpport);
> +
> ret = svc_create_thread(nfs_callback_svc, serv);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out_destroy;
> @@ -140,6 +136,8 @@ out:
> unlock_kernel();
> return ret;
> out_destroy:
> + dprintk("Couldn't create callback socket or server thread; err = %d\n",
> + ret);
> svc_destroy(serv);
> out_err:
> nfs_callback_info.users--;
>
> diff .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
> --- .prev/fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ static int nfsd_init_socks(int port)
>
> error = lockd_up(IPPROTO_UDP);
> if (error >= 0) {
> - error = svc_makesock(nfsd_serv, IPPROTO_UDP, port);
> + error = svc_makesock(nfsd_serv, IPPROTO_UDP, port,
> + SVC_SOCK_DEFAULTS);
> if (error < 0)
> lockd_down();
> }
> @@ -245,7 +246,8 @@ static int nfsd_init_socks(int port)
> #ifdef CONFIG_NFSD_TCP
> error = lockd_up(IPPROTO_TCP);
> if (error >= 0) {
> - error = svc_makesock(nfsd_serv, IPPROTO_TCP, port);
> + error = svc_makesock(nfsd_serv, IPPROTO_TCP, port,
> + SVC_SOCK_DEFAULTS);
> if (error < 0)
> lockd_down();
> }
>
> diff .prev/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h ./include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h
> --- .prev/include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h 2006-12-08 13:35:43.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./include/linux/sunrpc/svcsock.h 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct svc_sock {
> /*
> * Function prototypes.
> */
> -int svc_makesock(struct svc_serv *, int, unsigned short);
> +int svc_makesock(struct svc_serv *, int, unsigned short, int flags);
> void svc_delete_socket(struct svc_sock *);
> int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *, long);
> int svc_send(struct svc_rqst *);
>
> diff .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> --- .prev/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c 2006-12-08 13:35:43.000000000 +1100
> +++ ./net/sunrpc/svcsock.c 2006-12-08 13:36:33.000000000 +1100
> @@ -1659,9 +1659,11 @@ svc_delete_socket(struct svc_sock *svsk)
> * @serv: RPC server structure
> * @protocol: transport protocol to use
> * @port: port to use
> + * @flags: requested socket characteristics
> *
> */
> -int svc_makesock(struct svc_serv *serv, int protocol, unsigned short port)
> +int svc_makesock(struct svc_serv *serv, int protocol, unsigned short port,
> + int flags)
> {
> struct sockaddr_in sin = {
> .sin_family = AF_INET,
> @@ -1670,7 +1672,7 @@ int svc_makesock(struct svc_serv *serv,
> };
>
> dprintk("svc: creating socket proto = %d\n", protocol);
> - return svc_create_socket(serv, protocol, &sin, SVC_SOCK_DEFAULTS);
> + return svc_create_socket(serv, protocol, &sin, flags);
> }
>
> /*
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> NFS maillist - NFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

--
"We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals"
-- Quarry worker's creed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz: "Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20"
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20"
In reply to: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [NFS] [PATCH 002 of 13] knfsd: SUNRPC: allow creating an RPCservice without registering with portmapper"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]