Re: locking issue (hardirq+softirq+user)

[Jiri Slaby]

Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 14:35 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> an user still gets NMI watchdog warning, that the machine deadlocked.
> 
> have you tried enabling LOCKDEP ?

No, only PROVE_LOCKING, I apply him to turn this on too.

>> isr() /* i.e. hardirq context */
>> {
>> spin_lock(&lock);
>> ...
>> spin_unlock(&lock);
>> }
> 
> this is ok if you are 100% sure that this never gets called in any other
> way

It holds. Only in request_irq isr function name occurs.

>> timer() /* i.e. softirq context */
>> {
>> unsigned int f;
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, f) /* stack shows, that it locks here */
> 
> this is a bug, the flags are an "unsigned long" not "unsigned int"!
> It may do really bad stuff!

Aah, sorry, I misread the code, I saw flags, but it was port->flags;
board->flags, which is used in irq{save,restore} functions, is ulong.

thanks for the quick reply,
-- 
http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/            Jiri Slaby
faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz
e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint:
B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8  22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/