Re: [PATCH] drop page cache of a single file
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Dec 28 2006 - 06:04:34 EST
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:45:08 +0000
Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The kernel community needs to get a grip with the implementation of
> new syscalls - we need a process where architecture maintainers get
> to review the arguments _prior_ to them being accepted into the kernel.
> That way we can avoid silly architecture specific syscall changes like
hm, well, actually, sys_fadvise64_64 was discussed on linux-arch when
it went in.
(Gad, it was over three years ago! - glibc support should be pretty widespread
That's about as much discussion as these things will get. And this assumes
that people remember to mention it. Mental note made.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/