Re: [PATCH] Open Firmware device tree virtual filesystem
From: Rene Rebe
Date: Sun Dec 31 2006 - 07:06:41 EST
On Sunday 31 December 2006 11:49, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Kahn <dmk@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:11:53 -0800
> > All we've done is created a trivial implementation for exporting
> > the device tree to userland that isn't burdened by the powerpc
> > and sparc legacy code that's in there now.
> So now we'll have _3_ different implementations of exporting
> the OFW device tree via procfs. Your's, the proc_devtree
> of powerpc, and sparc's /proc/openprom
> That doesn't make any sense to me, having 3 ways of doing the same
> exact thing and making no attempt to share code at all.
> If you want to do something new that consolidates everything, with the
> goal of deprecating the existing stuff, that's great! But with they
> way you're doing this, all the sparc and powerpc implementations
> really can't take advantage of it.
> Am I the only person who sees something very wrong with this?
Nope you aren't, ACK to a unified user-space export from my side as well.
René Rebe - ExactCODE GmbH - Europe, Germany, Berlin
http://exactcode.de | http://t2-project.org | http://rene.rebe.name
+49 (0)30 / 255 897 45
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/