[patch 45/50] IPV4/IPV6: Fix inet{,6} device initialization order.

From: Chris Wright
Date: Fri Jan 05 2007 - 21:38:25 EST


-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------

From: David L Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>

It is important that we only assign dev->ip{,6}_ptr
only after all portions of the inet{,6} are setup.

Otherwise we can receive packets before the multicast
spinlocks et al. are initialized.

Signed-off-by: David L Stevens <dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
commit 30c4cf577fb5b68c16e5750d6bdbd7072e42b279

net/ipv4/devinet.c | 5 +++--
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- linux-2.6.19.1.orig/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ linux-2.6.19.1/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -165,9 +165,8 @@ struct in_device *inetdev_init(struct ne
NET_IPV4_NEIGH, "ipv4", NULL, NULL);
#endif

- /* Account for reference dev->ip_ptr */
+ /* Account for reference dev->ip_ptr (below) */
in_dev_hold(in_dev);
- rcu_assign_pointer(dev->ip_ptr, in_dev);

#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
devinet_sysctl_register(in_dev, &in_dev->cnf);
@@ -176,6 +175,8 @@ struct in_device *inetdev_init(struct ne
if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
ip_mc_up(in_dev);
out:
+ /* we can receive as soon as ip_ptr is set -- do this last */
+ rcu_assign_pointer(dev->ip_ptr, in_dev);
return in_dev;
out_kfree:
kfree(in_dev);
--- linux-2.6.19.1.orig/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ linux-2.6.19.1/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -413,8 +413,6 @@ static struct inet6_dev * ipv6_add_dev(s
if (netif_carrier_ok(dev))
ndev->if_flags |= IF_READY;

- /* protected by rtnl_lock */
- rcu_assign_pointer(dev->ip6_ptr, ndev);

ipv6_mc_init_dev(ndev);
ndev->tstamp = jiffies;
@@ -425,6 +423,8 @@ static struct inet6_dev * ipv6_add_dev(s
NULL);
addrconf_sysctl_register(ndev, &ndev->cnf);
#endif
+ /* protected by rtnl_lock */
+ rcu_assign_pointer(dev->ip6_ptr, ndev);
return ndev;
}


--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/