Re: [PATCH] local_t : Documentation

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > These patches extend and standardise local_t operations on each architectures,
> > > allowing a rich set of atomic operations to be done on per-cpu data with
> > > minimal performance impact. On some architectures, there seems to be no
> > > difference between the SMP and UP operation (same memory barriers, same
> > > LOCking), local.h simply includes asm-generic/local.h, which removes duplicated
> > > code.
> > 
> > Could you provide some Documentation/? Knowing when local_t can be
> > used is kind-of important.
> 
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> Thanks for this appropriate comment. I totally agree that there is a need for
> documentation about how local_t variables should be used. Here is the patch
> that adds Documentation/local_ops.txt. Comments are welcome.

AFAICT this fails to mention... Is local_t as big as int? As big as
long? Or perhaps smaller because high bits may be needed for locking?

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/