Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.19/2.6.20-rc3 buffered write slowdown

From: David Chinner
Date: Wed Jan 10 2007 - 18:19:25 EST


On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:12:02PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, David Chinner wrote:
>
> > Well, pdflush appears to be doing very little on both 2.6.18 and
> > 2.6.20-rc3. In both cases kswapd is consuming 10-20% of a CPU and
> > all of the pdflush threads combined (I've seen up to 7 active at
> > once) use maybe 1-2% of cpu time. This occurs regardless of the
> > dirty_ratio setting.
>
> That sounds a bit much for kswapd. How many nodes? Any cpusets in use?

It's an x86-64 box - an XE 240 - 4 core, 16GB RAM, single node, no cpusets.

> A upper maximum on the number of pdflush threads exists at 8. Are these
> multiple files or single file transfers?

See the test case i posted - a single file write per filesystem, three
filesystems being written to at once, all on different, unshared block
devices.

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/