Re: can someone explain "inline" once and for all?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > but in terms of strict C89 compatibility, it would seem to be a bit
> > late for that given:
> >
> >   $ grep -r "static inline " .
> >
> > no?
>
> The kernel does not use strict C89, it uses GNUC89.

  in that case, why did you just waste my time and all that bandwidth
by writing in your previous post:

"... so you need to use a different spelling when you want to stay
compatible with strict C89."

  please do me a favour and don't post another reply until you go back
and actually read my original question.

rday
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/